Argument For Ethical Behavior In Business

In the Goodrich case, this conclusion is clearly true. Not only were the workers at Goodrich suffering from negative consciences, the final results have been high-priced towards the company. Some of the participants seemed to benefit from promotions, but during the long-run the outcomes might be various if they continue to make unethical decisions within the name of "loyalty" towards the company, or due to the fact they believe it is going to support them get these kinds of promotions.

The most critical component of ethical business decisions is the individual. At any factor in the long system of numerous decisions made during the Goodrich case, any on the many folks could have stopped the lies if he had been willing to lose his job. However, none from the men were willing to consume that chance and eat that ethical stand. This can be why it is so significant that a company produce an ethical workplace that helps persons make the appropriate decisions.

As Cordtz writes, with respect to the relationship between the individual and the company.

For the most part, the managers on a firing line are much more concerned with staying out of trouble. The very first objective of just about all corporate ethics programs is to generate sure that all employees realize the laws and regulations that apply to their companies. . . . "That's why once we get into a program, we insist that top management be completely involved" (Cordtz "Ethicsplosion" 60).

In other words, it's the company's responsib

 

In all three cases, the decisions created by the workers and managers at Goodrich were unethical. The decisions to hide the data over a tests for the brakes did not optimize the satisfactions of all of the parties, did not respect the rights of the individuals, and was not consistent in the canons of justice.

However, organizations cannot do this unless they let men and women know that creating an ethical choice isn't only the correct thing to do, but that it'll be rewarded. At the same time, it ought to be made clear to all workers and mangers that unethical decisions will likely be punished. By giving promotions to a couple of managers at Goodrich who took component inside fraud, the company showed that doing what 1 was told to do and staying "loyal" on the business will probably be rewarded. That is just the opposite of the message that the business should be sending to its individual workers.

 

In other words, Vandivier knew that it was wrong to go as well as the fraud, but he looked at what he would lose if he refused to go in addition to it. He would lose his task as well as the security that went with it for himself and his large family. The point isn't that Vandivier is often a weak man, but that every person can also be tempted or frightened into making an unethical decision. So we see that in numerous if not most cases the individual has the odds against him or her when it comes to standing up and producing the proper decision. That is specially real after everybody else inside the business is taking part in the fraud and the unethical decisions.

 

 

 

 

Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.