We then mold Chamberlain's thoughts include values that are wholly connected to American values and principles like referity and freedom. As the Colonel thinks, "If men were equal in America?then they were equal everywhere?the American fights for mankind, for freedom; for the people, not the land" (Shaara 1996, 30). Despite Shaara's (1996) assertion that his study of the Battle is unpreconceived notioned and nonjudgmental, we see that lots(prenominal) fabricated accounts of the thoughts of men like Chamberlain do bias the account. For example, Chamberlain is presented as if he is the secretarial assistant of the American values, while both Lee and Longstreet are visualised a
s having no such ideological purpose for engaging in the conflict. Longstreet is portrayed as a General who fights the war because he likes to achieve supremacy in combat not as someone with sibylline moral convictions about it. We see this by being private to more fabricated thoughts attributed to him by Shaara (1996), "[Longstreet] did not think much of the Cause. He was a professional: the Cause was Victory" (68).
piece of music one of the primary causes of the Civil War was the secession of the grey States from the Union, Shaara's (1996) account portrays the conflict as being one fought over freedom and equality versus slavery and aristocratic (i.e.
Southern) class distinctions. season Shaara tries not to glorify the cause of either the North or South, his fictional accounts of the thoughts of significant participants on both sides does appear to bias the perception. For example, after Pickett's Charge is recognized as a reverse by the Southern forces, General Lee is portrayed as someone, like Longstreet, with no particular personal agenda for conducting the war. As he "tells" Longstreet, "You and I we have no Cause. We have barely the Army" (Shaara 1996, 3612). Likewise, in a letter to his brother, Tom Chamberlain mocks a Confederate prisoner's confusion over why he is struggle in the Civil War, "Then after that I asked this expletive what rights he had that we were offendin', and he said, well, he didn't know, but he must(prenominal) have some rights he didn't know nothin' about" (Shaara 1996, 180).
Shaara, M. (1996). The Killer Angels. New York, NY: Ballantine.
Shaara's novel is well organized and supported with ample historical documentation to make it credible and scholarly. Despite the spare bias toward the North with respect to the reasons for fighting the war, the author's heavy trust on such documentation pr
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.