Law At The Beginning Of Life

The surrogate mother should be allowed to receive recompense oer and above her actual expenses , and the remit of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology imprimatur should be expanded to regulate the send of surrogacy in the UKCritically treasure this statement within the context of the legal and ethical issues which it raisesIntroductionSurrogacy has been in practice since Biblical times though not in the form of human reproduction technology as at present . It is said that Bible story has its repercussions even now for disobeying the God s Command and due to engaging of Hagar by Sarah to curb her husband Abraham s child as Sarah was not herself able to commence babies ) It is not surprising , therefore , the surrogacy was condemned outright when it reared its head in a new form in the early 80s The practice of surrogacy was not legally allowed until 1994 ever since it was started in 1984 in the U .K . for various ethical and technical reasons . While it has taken 10 years for the U .K . Government to deliberate on the font and come to terms with inevitable practice of surrogacy to meet the aspirations of the unfruitful couples , the U .K . Government has been unequivocal in prohibiting extra payment to the surrogate mothers over above the expenses incurred for the treatment and also passing game of earnings due to confinement . Surrogacy is still illegal in Austria , Germ either Sweden and Norway . In Finland , Greece and Ireland surrogacy is in practice with no law in force . Australia does not allow for commercial purposes . France , Denmark and the Netherlands prohibit any payments to surrogate mothers unlike in U .K . to a fair extent . In the U .S , it varies from State to State notwithstanding in no State it is allowed for commercial purposes .

This seeks to critically decompose the proposition for extra payment also and the cocktail dress for expanding the scene of Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority to regulate the practice of surrogacy in U .KBackgroundBefore embarking on the issue of legalising ex-gratia payments for surrogacy service , the history that lead to the recognition of surrogacy needs to be looked into . First ever end of surrogacy took place in 1978 but appeared in the press actually late . In the said case A v C (1985 A and his disseverner not having children arranged with C for bearing a child through A s spermatozoan for a consideration of ? 3 ,000 . Later C refused to part with the child . The court held that though the contract could not be enforced , A could father the child . The reason cited by the Judge Comyn was public policy . The contract for purchase and trade of child was against public policy . On appeal by the surrogate mother , appeal court could not have the custody of the child . In a later case Re C (A minor (Wardship :Surrogacy (1985 , a couple from the States approached Kim Cotton in the U .K . who consented to give birth to a baby...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .