The Harappans and Sumerians are distinctly opposite politically. While the Sumerians developed the worlds first monarchy, the Harappans whitethorn have developed the first democracy.
Very little try has been found of a king in the Indus Valley, only one white priest-king idol and a silver crown; not enough to establish that the royalty were the rulers. Instead the empire was divided up into regions with half a dozen cities functioning as capitals and was governed by a company of people. Archeologist Jonathan Mark Kenoyed has speculated that the Harappan rulers were merchants, ritual specialists and individuals peremptory important resources, instead of just one social group controlling the rest. From the construction of the cities however it does appear there were several(prenominal) social classes, as the citadel is usually 20 feet higher(prenominal) than the middle and lower town. The Sumerians, on the other hand, developed into city-states control by a priest-king. The...If you want to get a beneficial essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.