Time To Think

Chase Minnear

Critical thought

29 November 2011

Critical Thinking: Rebuttal to Time to Think
In Mark Franeks denomination Time to Think he disputes the use of extended cartridge holder on the sit. Mark Franek supports his argument with evidence that leads to suggest the exclaim of extended time on the sit down under a false guise of training disabilities. He goes into further particular stating that the number of students that have injectn the SAT with finical accommodations has double in the last decade.
The main premises Mark Franek uses to hold dear his arguments are: Fellow students are taking advantage of the special accommodations granted for learning disabilities, these accommodations are not handed out(a) equally to learning disabled students across the race and socioeconomic lines, and the author critiques another plan by teachers that believe that allowing students to take the SAT in separate portions would increase the fairness of the test.



Franeks other premises conclude that if we look at the SAT as a universal gatekeeper to universities that SAT should be fair to all classes, and their should be a tag for development extended time, also we need to find a consequence for the increasing amount of students using their learning disabilities to have an frame in on the SAT.
The solution Mark Franek offers is that the time limit to the SAT should be eliminated. An just make the questions from simple to impossible to think the students proficiency. By doing this it will accommodate all learning styles, including those with learning disabilities. Franek concludes by stating that the SAT needs to be taken congest to the drawing board.
RebuttalIf you want to get a full essay, revise it on our website: Orderessay



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .