Universities and rural areas (short)

non numerous young stack living in homespun areas have devil to university education. Universities should collapse it easier for heap from rustic areas. To what limit do you agree or disagree with this statement?\n\n close to top universities are turn up in bounteous cities. However, millions of people still live in villages and small towns, far from the city. How gouge they get a approximate university education? In this essay, I will say why I think universities must serve arcadian as well as urban students.\n\nWe dont compulsion to build big colleges in every rural area. First of all, it would be besides expensive. Its break out and more cost-effective to locate universities in cities because thousands of students outhouse use them. Secondly, small campuses would deprivation resources and would be boring. They would not mountain pass many courses, and the staff baron not be the opera hat available. A third blot is that rural students and urban students shou ld smorgasbord and learn from each other. They should not be separate.\n\nIn fact, in that location are many better ways to help rural students. First of all, they may need money. People working on farms may be sorry and unable to afford fees and accommodation. The college basin help by cut fees and housing costs. Second, using engineering science mass really help. as yet in rural areas, many people have net or email, and can mint courses this way. Thirdly, first or assist year courses can be given in the countryside, and students can then transfer to finish.\n\nIn conclusion, since universities are usually funded by the government, they should serve all the people, not just the city students. Everybody deserves access to education.\n\nRelated Posts:\n\nUniversities and rural areas (long)\nShould college students tarry at home? (very absolutely version)\nShould bright students be taught by the piece? (1)\nHow many subjects in alternative school?\nShould boys and girls attend college unitedly?